RPX

  • Careers
  • DynaVibe Classic
  • DynaVibe GX
    • DynaVibe GX - Prop Balancing
    • Turbine Sensor
    • Strobex Adapter
  • DynaTrack
  • DryBot
  • Support
  • Store
    • Fixed Wing Store
    • Rotorcraft Store
    • Turbine Store
    • Strobex Adapter Store
    • Accessory Store
    • Engine Dehydrator
  • Calibration
  • Careers
  • DynaVibe Classic
  • DynaVibe GX
    • DynaVibe GX - Prop Balancing
    • Turbine Sensor
    • Strobex Adapter
  • DynaTrack
  • DryBot
  • Support
  • Store
    • Fixed Wing Store
    • Rotorcraft Store
    • Turbine Store
    • Strobex Adapter Store
    • Accessory Store
    • Engine Dehydrator
  • Calibration

ICE?

12/30/2017

Comments

 
Picture
Let's go fly!  ...maybe not.

The current METAR made me think twice:
KSWO 302253Z 03008KT 10SM BKN024 OVC030 M07/M13 A3033

Below freezing. Low clouds.  Should I worry about the aircraft accumulating ice?  I've read [1,2] that most aircraft icing occurs when air temperatures are between 0 °C and -20 °C and I wondered how difficult it would be to verify that claim.  Here's what I found.

First, I downloaded several hundred PIREPS from aviationweather.gov.  Then I filtered the PIREPS for those that reported ice along with the atmospheric temperature. 

For example, here the pilot is reporting rime ice with an atmospheric temperature of -13 °C: 
TYS UA /OV TYS/TM 1331/FL130/TP E145/TA M13/IC MOD RIME ICE/RM ICING STARTING AT 130 AND ENDING AT 115

Next, I constructed a histogram of the atmospheric temperatures with reported ice, and here is the result.  
Picture
What is amazing is that this plot is comprised of just 29 pilot reports and it agrees perfectly with the original premise that aircraft structural icing occurs most often between 0 °C and -20 °C.  That's good information to know before poking your head into cold clouds.

​

References:
1. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/Image/lmk/Brian%20S/LMK_Icing_Show.pdf
2. https://www.faasafety.gov/gslac/ALC/course_content.aspx?cID=33&sID=152&preview=true
​

Comments

Left? Right? Or BOTH?

11/13/2017

Comments

 
I've been involved in some discussions lately regarding which fuel selector setting to use on a Cessna 172.  Most 172s have four settings:  Left, Right, Both, and Off.  This seems like a brain-dead question, doesn't it?   Maybe not!

MY STORY
During flight training in a C172, I, like most student pilots, was taught to leave the fuel tank selector on "Both" unless there was a reason to change it. That setting worked well for about 200 hours.  

But on March 26th, 2016, I was cruising at 7,500 ft (~6,500 ft AGL) when I noticed a drop in RPM.  At first, I thought it was just a throttle setting issue.  So I made an adjustment.  A minute later, the needle on the tach was back below the bottom of the green arc.  That's when I felt my heart crawl up into my throat.  Something was wrong.  Very wrong.  I was losing power.

​TROUBLE
When the RPM drops in a carbureted 172, my first suspicion is always carb ice.  No big deal.  Pull the carb heat and expect a sputter.  All good.   

Not in my case. 

​I pulled the carb heat and the RPM increased!  What?  That shouldn't happen.  ​​At that point I could hear the voice of my flight instructor in my head, resonating from years ago:  "TURN TOWARD THE NEAREST AIRPORT, NOW!" So that's what I did.
Picture
Nice cruise at 7,500ft - what could go wrong?
Next, of course, out came the emergency checklist.  Standard stuff.  Switch tanks.  Left mag.  Right mag, etc., etc.  Nothing I did helped the situation.  The engine at this point was beginning to sputter, and things got real.

"OK city approach, Cessna 1234Echo, seven south-west of three-Oscar-three at seven thousand five hundred, losing engine power, inbound Purcell, one on board."  Let me assure you that even before declaring an emergency, once you say "one on board" you have ATC's full attention and everyone else on the radio gets really, really quiet.

Picture
Schematic of the fuel system on a Cessna 172.
With ATC watching for traffic and aware of my position and situation, I could concentrate more on the problem at hand.  What was I missing?  "It must be fuel," I thought.  "Tanks are full.  Fuel selector on 'Both.'  Mixture rich....  Nothing is helping.  So what now?" 

"Fly the plane.  Fly the plane.  Fly the plane.  Trim for best glide.  Set a direct heading to the airport.  You get one shot.  What are the winds?  Manage energy... Uhm.  Oh sh*t, there's a damn lake at the end of the runway!  You must be kidding." 
Picture
Left Base - Purcell, OK, Runway 17 - Not a nice view with an engine failure.
Let's just say that I approached high and dropped the flaps at the last minute.  I may have landed long. But I wasn't wet! Or worse!

Right before touching down (yes, on the runway) I remember thinking about how I was going to have to PUSH the plane from the runway to get it clear.   But, that wasn't the case.  As soon as the wheels touched the runway, the engine started and ran perfectly.  Unbelievable.  I taxied to parking.  Fifteen minutes later, I was able to think straight, get my legs under me and exit the airplane.
THE CAUSE
If you carefully read the POH for early Cessna 172s, the POH cautions you about flying on both tanks when cruising at altitudes over 5000 ft.  Doing so may cause "power irregularities" (A.K.A. engine failure).  But I guess this is okay if it is in the POH.  Just switch to one tank, ignore the sputtering, glide for 60 (very long) seconds, then switch to the other tank and hope the vapor has cleared and the engine restarts.  That is why many early Cessna 172s have a placard on the fuel selector (between the seats, out of sight) that says something to the effect of "Use single tank above 5000 ft."  Yes, on those models, it matters.

LESSON LEARNED
The decision to fly on Left, Right, or Both may not be a simple judgement call.   The decision shouldn't be based on the consensus opinion of you and your buddies.  And the proper option may not even seem logical.   You must read the POH, ADs, and ACs for your aircraft and follow their guidance.   Your life may depend on it.
RESOURCES
FAA: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/airworthiness_directives
Example C172 POH: ​http://rob.com/matt/manuals/172_poh_59.pdf

Actual Fuel Management Procedure - 1959 Cessna 172
Picture
Comments

Running Without a Cowl

7/14/2017

Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Running your air cooled engine with the cowl removed is harder on the engine than you may realize. Uncowled, air is blown over the cylinders and not through the cylinder's cooling fins. So the bottom of the engine is left to heat-soak and the top is cooled. This uneven heating results in distorted cylinders which damages the cylinders and the moving parts inside the cylinders.
​
Continental recommends fabricating a scoop out of sheet metal for use when running up the engine on the ground when the cowl is removed. This provides a safe amount of airflow for runups and can usually be constructed in a way that it is out of the way for most maintenance procedures. (Drawing credit: Continental Motors)
Comments

    Categories

    All
    Aviation Safety
    Business Bits
    Engine Care
    Non-Aviation Uses
    Propeller Balancing
    Track And Balance
    UAVs
    User Stories
    Vibration Analysis

    RSS Feed

    CALIBRATION
QUESTIONS?
+1.833.268.7653 
​​
[email protected]
FOLLOW US
Picture
Picture
Picture
Fixed Wing
DynaVibe Classic
DynaVibe GX3
Fixed Wing Store
​DryBot Engine Dehydrator
Rotorcraft
DynaVibe GX3
​DynaTrack
​Strobex Adapter
​Rotorcraft Store
Turbine
Vibration Surveys
​Turbine Store
Support
Warranty
Product Updates
FAQ's
​Contact
What we're up to
Blog
​Facebook
​Instagram
Testimonials
Picture
AVIATION   •   CONSTRUCTION   •   ENGINEERING SERVICES   •   FIRST RESPONSE   •   UNMANNED
RPX Technologies, Inc.
​3523 North Star Dr., Stillwater, OK 74075
​+1.833.268.7653
Copyright © 2024